![]() |
||||
| ||||
![]() |
||||
|
||||
![]() |
![]() Saturday, April 03, 2004 via snowball.htm Internet Hoax Of The Week![]() posted by Gary Williams at 12:22 AM | link | Friday, April 02, 2004 via whiskey river "We've heard that a million monkeys at a million keyboards could produce the Complete Works of Shakespeare;posted by Gary Williams at 11:35 PM | link | Imaginary Comics In An Imaginary Week, In November (More Next Month)From Warren Ellis' Bad SignalFrom: warrene@aol.com Date: 04/02/04 07:54:21 To: badsignal@lists.flirble.org Subject: [BAD SIGNAL]November bad signal WARREN ELLIS Years ago, I sat down and thought about what adventure comics might've looked like today if superhero comics hadn't have happened. If, in fact, the pulp tradition of Weird Thrillers had jumped straight into comics form without mutating into the superhero subgenre we know today. And then, a couple of years later, Alan Moore went ahead and did it with the America's Best Comics line. Years ago, I sat down and wondered what the regular 32-page adventure comics single would look like if you took away preconceptions about design and the dominant single form. And then, a couple of years later, Dan Jurgens went ahead and did it with the Tangent line at DC. The other day, I was thinking about response songs. Rappers taking shots at each other, covers that answer something in the original, art made in reaction to art. Which, you kind of hope, is not the same as being reactionary. The small music labels 555 Recordings and Dark Beloved Cloud have singles clubs. People play down the importance of singles these days -- they don't sell the way they used to, downloads bother the music business -- but I love them. Sometimes one song contained on one object is all you need to move the axis of the world. Self-contained and saying all that needs to be said. Singles and Tangent and ABC all kind of stuck together in my head, and I began conceiving of a response. The Singles Group was the working title -- not permanent, as after a while it starts to sound like a dodgy online adult dating service. An imaginary line of comics singles. Sitting in that peculiarity of comics distribution, the fifth week. A couple of times a year, a month has five weeks, but publishers schedule in four-week cycles, so the fifth week is often kind of empty. It's the imaginary week of comics publishing. And that's where you put an imaginary line of comics. A fifth-week event has always been on my list of Things To Do In Comics. And then someone checked the calendar for me, and showed me that the next available fifth week window is the last week of December. Which is just a deadzone. No-one's got any money. I'd be taking the piss if I put it there. So the plan changed a little. Five imaginary first issues of imaginary series from an imaginary line of comics released on an imaginary fifth week. We're going to put it in the middle of November. More next month. -- W _______________________________________________ Warren Elli' mailing list sent from Warren's handheld posted by Gary Williams at 2:13 AM | link | via Stu Savory's Blog - April 2004
Good luck, Stu, as one out-of-work programmer to another... Of course, I don't have the doctorate or any of your other qualifications, b'hey... posted by Gary Williams at 1:30 AM | link | Thursday, April 01, 2004 via In The Pipeline posted by Gary Williams at 2:45 AM | link | Wednesday, March 31, 2004 Law 1001: Never Talk To The FBI Without Your LawyerFrom Declan McCullagh's PolitechFrom: Declan McCullagh
Date: 03/31/04 01:02:25 To: politech@politechbot.com Subject: [Politech] Lesson from Martha Stewart: Don't ever talk to the FBI http://www.nwanews.com/times/story_Editorial.php?storyid=115586 Guest Commentary : Martha's lesson - don't talk to the FBI BY DONALD KAUL Posted on Saturday, March 20, 2004 Here is the lesson to be learned from the fall of Martha Stewart: Don't ever, under any circumstances, answer questions put to you by the FBI or any other federal agent unless you have a competent criminal lawyer at your side. And it would be better if it were a very good criminal lawyer. There are other lessons to be drawn from the fate of poor Martha, but that's the main one. You see, there is a section in the federal code, referred to as 1001 by legal eagles, that makes it a crime to lie to a federal agent. The agent doesn't have to put you under oath. If you tell him or her a lie, you're guilty. The federal officer doesn't even have to tape the conversation. All he or she has to do is produce handwritten notes that indicate that you made false statements. So, if you misspeak or the agent mishears or there is an ambiguity that the agent chooses to interpret in an unfortunate (for you) direction, you're on the hook. There's also the possibility that you might be tempted to shade the truth a bit when an IRS agent is quizzing you about that business deduction you took for the trip to Vegas. My advice to you is: Don't do it. To be on the safe side, when confronted by a federal agent, don't say anything at all unless your lawyer says you have to. It's a shame things have come to this. It used to be that people felt it their duty as citizens to cooperate with federal authorities. That was before Law 1001. We now live in an era of Incredible Shrinking Civil Rights. You have to protect yourself at all times. Let's look more closely at the case of Poor Martha the Match Girl. What did she do? She was convicted of lying about the reason she sold her shares in a biotechnology company two years ago. She said she sold them because they had fallen to the price at which she and her broker had agreed to sell. _______________________________________________ Politech mailing list Archived at http://www.politechbot.com/ Moderated by Declan McCullagh (http://www.mccullagh.org/) posted by Gary Williams at 3:15 PM | link | via space.com posted by Gary Williams at 3:14 PM | link | Tuesday, March 30, 2004 via Mr. Useless A Weekend For Pictures![]() I've been putting-off updating this thing these last couple of days. I think about writing, about any number of things—none of which seem worth the bother of typing. So I've been killing time playing computer pinball, waiting for the writing urge to attain critical mass, thinking 'this is more boring than writing, I'll quit after this game...well, one more...' And yesterday I fooled around with my PictureIt! 2001 software, doing this sort of thing: "Um...yeah. That's just...that is really...something..." posted by Gary Williams at 12:47 PM | link | |
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
||||
![]() |